David Altshuler on “Winning the Game”

Although his article is on college applications, I think the same concepts apply for middle school applications. My student families are wonderful. However, sometimes 5th grade gets a bit too crazy for my liking. Read and consider:

Pow! Smack! Oof!

Envision vicious combatants locked in a zero-sum game in which only a small number can survive and only one can triumph. Imagine the contestants scratching, clawing, and punching one another for any and every competitive advantage. “Omni contra omni” wrote Hobbs. “All against all.” No quarter asked or given. Winner take all and devil take the hindmost.

Is my topic this week mixed martial arts? Or am I writing about “The Hunger Games”? Am I describing your first marriage and subsequent litigious divorce?

Nah. Of course, I’m writing about admissions to competitive colleges.

On Sunday, you tell your children to love their neighbors. Every religious tradition has a similar version of Deuteronomy 19:18. But on Monday, our kids get a different message: “If you help your classmate study for her chemistry exam, she will get a better grade; she will be graduated closer to the top of the class; she will get the last scholarship; she will be the one to absorb the scarce resources. She will be admitted to a TOP COLLEGE. And you won’t!

To the contrary, if your child gives of herself and helps her neighbor study, your child will end up drinking wine in the gutter. If the paradigm is “there is only one cabbage and I want MY daughter to have that cabbage” then it could be argued that your daughter won’t have any cabbage.

But the counter intuitive and very good news is that in college admissions, there are more than enough metaphorical cabbages to go around. Indeed, some college cabbages aren’t even harvested and rot, uneaten.

The vast majority of colleges admit virtually every qualified applicant. The issue isn’t “Where can you get in?” but “What can you DO in the classroom once you are admitted?.” Your valedictorian president-of-the-school daughter with perfect SAT scores was denied at Princeton? Your valedictorian president-of-the-school daughter with perfect SAT scores has to go to Franklin and Marshall instead?

Oh, the horror!

It will come as no surprise that many of my clients applying to competitive colleges are writhing shells of stressed out, lonely kids for whom high school is a miserable series of solitary vigils and anxiety ridden evaluations. Are these wraiths reading and learning until the wee hours because the books and ideas are the most cogent in the history of civilization? Are they doing projects and writing papers because they are fascinated by Sophocles, Newton, Shakespeare, and Virginia Wolfe? Not so much. These automatons are learning for the sake of grades, grades and more grades. They are learning for the sake of class rank. They are learning for the sake of admissions to competitive colleges.

What’s the way to win this game? Is it possible to “stack the deck,” to ensure that your daughter wins and that everyone else’s daughter loses? Is there a “fix,” so that your valedictorian son with an 800 on his math SAT is admitted and everyone else’s valedictorian son with 800 on his math SAT is denied?

Nope.

Beyond a point, admissions to hyper competitive colleges is random. Arbitrary. A roll of the dice. Based on factors beyond the control of the student. Is a beautiful sunset better than a strawberry milkshake? Depends how thirsty you are. Is that tuba player from the small town in the Midwest “better” than that yearbook editor from that major metropolis? Unless you’re willing to move to Kenosha and hand your child a tuba, the answer may not matter.

The other possible solution to the issue of competitive college admissions is as straight forward as it is effective: Don’t buy a ticket for that train.

To the contrary, rather than insisting your kids compete in a sick game where the best case scenario is that they crawl to the top over the lifeless bodies of their shattered fellow students, suggest instead that they learn to collaborate. Help them learn to cooperate, to give a classmate a hand.

Our world will be a better place and your children will benefit if you allow them to “do unto others” each and every day of the week. And because they are not only accomplished students but also good citizens, they’ll do even better–even if they happen to be denied at a “top” college.

Click Here to Leave a Comment on Our Website

Quick Links…
My Website
My blog

Contact Information
Phone: (305) 663-9394
Fax: (305) 663-9395

Posted in Educational resources, Uncategorized | Comments Off on David Altshuler on “Winning the Game”

David Altshulter Newsletter on learning differences

I think David’s newsletter this week is a very important reminder that not all children (or adults, for that matter) learn the same:

David Altshuler, M.S. Newsletter

May 14, 2013

Chances Are

A buddy of mine explained the likelihood of getting a book of poems published. Consider all money spent in entertainment industry. Movies make up the vast percentage of expenditures; books are almost an afterthought. Of all the books that are published each year, most are non-fiction–calendars, cooks books, political biographies. Fiction is a tiny part of a publisher’s list. NEW fiction books have to compete with perennial best sellers like _The Hobbit_ and _Tom Sawyer_. Poetry is the smallest percentage of fiction and poetry by new authors is the smallest percentage of poetry. In short, the odds against a new author getting a book of poetry published are enormous.

If all the books that have been published were lined up on one shelf and you picked one book at random, the chance that you would pick a book of new poems is effectively zero.

***

Imagine a list of the names of all the people alive today, a “phone book” if you will with seven billion entries. What is the likelihood that you will pick a name at random and want to have a conversation with that person? Even limiting the list to the people with whom you COULD have a conversation–not everybody speaks the language(s) that you do–chances are that you’d pick someone you didn’t want to talk to. Even in this country, you could end up thinking, “You voted for THAT GUY? How could you vote for THAT GUY?” And wish you were speaking to someone else.

What about the odds of finding a song you’d like to listen to? Of all the genres of music and all the songs within those broad groupings, you could very well get rap if you like classical. Or the reverse. With millions of recording, if you’re waiting for Bruce Springsteen’s “Pink Cadillac” to come around on the dial, you may be listening for a while.

***

Most importantly, the odds of getting into someone else’s head is the least likely of all. Because there are more people with more different learning styles than there are songs or books. Even the best teachers know the frustration. “How can she not understand that? I’ve explained it three different ways! How could ANYBODY not understand that?” But the fact is that she still just doesn’t get it.

“Then she’s not trying hard enough. She’s lazy; she’s unmotivated.”

Maybe.

Or maybe she’s not ready; maybe the curriculum isn’t developmentally appropriate. Maybe she has learning differences; maybe she’s got emotional issues that prevent her from attending to what you’re saying and how you’re saying it.

Maybe you just don’t know what’s in her head.

Because just like you have a tough time understanding how someone could vote for THAT GUY, or how someone could like THAT KIND of music, it’s hard to know what’s going on in someone else’s head, what someone else’s learning style is.

As teachers and parents, we have a choice. We can keep hammering away believing that we are right: Everyone must learn THIS WAY. (Similar arguments “All Catholics should become Protestants;” “all atheists should become believers;” “all Republicrats should become Democrans.”)

Or we can embrace those whose learning style is different from ours and invite a whole bunch more people to the party.

What do you think the chances are?

Quick Links…
My Website
My blog

Contact Information
Phone: (305) 663-9394
Fax: (305) 663-9395

Posted in Educational resources, Uncategorized | Comments Off on David Altshulter Newsletter on learning differences

Eleanor Roosevelt on children THINKING

“Every effort must be made in childhood to teach the young to use their own minds. For one thing is certain: if they don’t make up their own minds, someone will do it for them.”

Posted in Educational resources, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Eleanor Roosevelt on children THINKING

NY Times…No Rich Child Left Behind?

Something to think about. What can we do better to educate ALL children?

NY Times….No Rich Child Left Behind?

Posted in Educational resources | Comments Off on NY Times…No Rich Child Left Behind?

Does Homework Really Work?

Thorough article addressing all sides.

http://momshomeroom.msn.com/parenting-articles/homework_study_skills/does-homework-really-work-/253950664?wt.mc_id=msn

Posted in Educational resources | Comments Off on Does Homework Really Work?

NY Times Article (Education v. Future jobs?)

Education versus business? Are our schools building critical thinking and preparing our children for the future? Worth reading, including stimulating comments at end.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/opinion/sunday/friedman-need-a-job-invent-it.html?ref=opinion&_r=0

Posted in Educational resources | Comments Off on NY Times Article (Education v. Future jobs?)

NY Times: The Influence of Schools on Boys

Something to consider. However, when reading the article, you should read the posts following the article as well.  Link to the article is below:

Honor Code

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NY Times: The Influence of Schools on Boys

Another good David Altshuler article….

David Altshuler, M.S. Newsletter

September 25, 2012

This Brain is Your Brain

There is a story about Enrico Fermi, the great 20th century physicist. A graduate student is trying to impress the professor by reciting a litany of sub-atomic particles. Fermi puts the student in his place by responding, “Young man, if I could remember the names of those particles, I would have been a botanist.”

Why do generations of physics students love this story? Is it the put down that resonates so soundly? “I am a pure thought guy,” communicated the older scientist. “You cannot play in my league if all you can do is memorize.”

Surely with technology, memorization of facts is less important now that in previous generations when access to information was sporadic. The capitals of the states, the books of the Bible, the name of the Vice Presidents chronologically or alphabetically–all are available with a few clicks. Less emphasis in the curriculum should be placed on knowing the names of the six wives of Henry VIII.

But, there’s a third “zing” from the Fermi story that I like even better than the “put down” and the “thinking is better than memorizing” take-aways. I like the “All minds are different” punch line. Fermi won a Nobel Prize for physics in 1938; he worked on the Manhattan project helping to develop the atomic bomb; he has a class of sub-atomic particles named after him*. In short, he was one of the greatest physicists of the modern age.

But he would have been a lousy botanist.

We need physicists and we need botanists. We need memorizers and we need pure thinkers. Of course, no one would be so short sighted as to argue that these categories are truly dichotomous. The best memorizers need to do some thinking and the best thinkers need to do some memorizing. There is room in our culture for all kinds of brains.

Is there room in your home for different learning styles?

Or when your kid comes home excited about learning Spanish, do you force her to do math? When your son comes home from school eager to finish reading _Sounder_, do you insist that he do science worksheets instead? When your daughter walks in the door excited about learning math, do you insist that she read a book? If your daughter wants to take apart a car engine, do you tell her to get back to her sewing?

Were Enrico Fermi your son, would you have discouraged him from studying physics?

So there is no possible misunderstanding, let me clarify that the following is not OK: If your child comes home from school excited about playing “Shoot, Shoot, Shoot, Blood, Blood, Blood, Kill, Kill, Kill,” that child should be redirected to reading a book or engaging in some other activity that will not put him solidly on the path to rehab for video game addiction. If your child comes home and says, “What I’m best at and what interests me the most is smoking pot so rather than helping to cook dinner, I’m going to drive around town and blow dope” that’s not OK either.

Cognitively, it’s time to allow our children to choose their own path; they will walk farther in the right direction if we do. By forcing–or attempting to force–kids to study what we want, how we want, and when we want, we lessen the likelihood that they will end up in the right place–on the dais in Stockholm, or under the hood of a car.

* “Fermions.” Which include quarks and leptons. How cool is that?

Quick Links…
My Website
My blog

Contact Information
Phone: (305) 663-9394
Fax: (305) 663-9395

David Altshuler, M.S. Newsletter

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Another good David Altshuler article….

Michael Jordan Failure Commercial

A parent of one of my students told me about this commercial. I now use it whenever a child needs to understand how important failures are in life. It’s only about a minute long and is worth viewing:

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

NY Times…Aug. 4, 2012..Raising Successful Children

August 4, 2012
Raising Successful Children
By MADELINE LEVINE
Interesting NY Times article on which parenting styles help children succeed.  I recommend reading it.

Posted in Educational resources | Comments Off on NY Times…Aug. 4, 2012..Raising Successful Children